Skip to content
Greenwich Counts — Greenwich, in numbers.Local help →
Greenwich Counts / Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham · Greenwich

Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham: your neighbourhood

Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

Homes rented privately: 13% here, compared with 26% across Greenwich (12.9 percentage points lower).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 35.2% here, compared with 45.7% across Greenwich (10.5 percentage points lower).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented from a council or housing association: 25% here, compared with 31% across Greenwich (6.4 percentage points lower).

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

16.3%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

2,366 out of 14,532.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

5.4%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

778 out of 14,532.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

14,532

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All usual residents

14,532 out of 14,532.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

35.2%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

4,102 out of 11,666.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

51.4%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

2,929 out of 5,694.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

19.7%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,124 out of 5,694.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

36.7%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

4,281 out of 11,672.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

58.8%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

6,867 out of 11,672.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

4.2%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

490 out of 11,672.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

19.2%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

Residents aged 16 and over

2,244 out of 11,666.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

13%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

720 out of 5,694.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

18.9%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,204 out of 11,672.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

25%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator

All households

1,402 out of 5,694.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

4.5%

21 March 2021 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

524 out of 11,672.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

834 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 878 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 80 mapped crimes in September 2024; 63 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 20248014
October 20246116
November 20248414
December 20248820
January 20258124
February 20256212
March 20257622
April 20256524
May 20258029
June 20256818
July 20257821
August 20255526
September 20257510
October 20256410
November 20255814
December 20256110
January 20268217
February 20267414
March 20266820
April 20266317
May 20265728
June 20268430
July 20268517
August 20266324
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Mottingham, Coldharbour & New Eltham
CategoryMapped crimes
violent crime328
vehicle crime131
criminal damage arson68
drugs66
other theft61
public order60
burglary46
other crime25
robbery16
shoplifting14
possession of weapons8
theft from the person7
bicycle theft4
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across Greenwich →